Alaskas Hope Animal Rescue

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

3 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To take animals from the streets, get them vetted, assessed and fed. Then to find them permanent homes

Housing and feeding animals

Revenue model: Contribution and grant supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and grants. The filing reports them as one total, so it does not say how much was granted.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: Limited
Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -103%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.