Alaska State Youth Soccer Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943082137
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Anchorage, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9072254857
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $778,317
- Expenses
- $868,836
- Assets
- $146,641
- Liabilities
- $70,458
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN OLIVER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- HEATHER WILLIS (PRESIDENT)
- DANNY REYNOLDS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN OLIVER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $78,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations mission is to provide leadership, administrate state level programs, educate the members and the public about the game of soccer. The organization also coordinates youth soccer in the state of Alaska to accomplish the following measurable objectives:1.maximize the number of youth soccer players in Alaska at all ages and skill levels to expand opportunity for participation, and promote visibility of the sport.2.maximize the number of ussf and nscaa licensed youth soccr coaches at each coaching level to advance the level of player skill and competition.3.maximize the number of ussf licensed youth soccer referees at each licensed level to promote fair play and amplify knowledge of the rules.4.maximize the number and quality of playing fields and indoor facilities available for youth play to improve opportunities for play. The organization also provides an effective forum and central point for communication between the public and all soccer players, coaches, referrees, clubs
What it reported doing in 2025
Camps and programs: the organization funds programs and camps of youthsoccer for over 6,700 members in the state. The various programs includeclinics, tournaments, and trips for players. The organization also providescoordination with the national youth soccer association. The variousprograms are designed for recreational soccer and olympic potential playersin the state of Alaska. Other clinics the organization provides: coach andreferee development, supplemental soccer training, adp/odp training withthe exposure to college coaches.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 74.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $644K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.