Alaska Seafood Cooperative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261317661
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2064627690
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $721,476
- Expenses
- $754,165
- Assets
- $53,685
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Glenn Merrill (VP/President)
- Jason Anderson (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Sarah Webster (Employee): $199,383 total reported compensation
- Elizabeth Concepcion (Employee): $163,058 total reported compensation
- John Gauvin (Employee): $54,434 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The cooperative was formed for the purpose of promoting, fostering, and encouraging the intelligent and orderly harvest of Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands ("BSAI") yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole, Atka mackerel and Pacific cod, Aleutian Islands Pacific Ocean perch, and other BSAI and Gulf of Alaska groundfish; reducing waste and improving resource utilization by vessels employed in such fisheries (together, the "Fisheries"); reducing the discard mortality of non-target species by vessels employed in the Fisheries and supporting research and public education about the Fisheries.
What it reported doing in 2024
Alaska Seafood Cooperative (ASC) is an industry group representing several "freezer trawler" fishing companies that all share the goal of improving the management and ecological stewardship of flatfish and other non-pollock groundfish fisheries in the Bering Sea.Flatfish are managed by the same strict, science-based standards that have made Alaska fisheries globally renowned as among the best managed in the world. Catches are held at or below scientific limits, none of these stocks are overfished, and fishing is strictly regulated to prevent excessive bycatch of other species.Bycatch is a major concern for ASC and fishery managers. Bycatch limits are placed on the mortality of incidental catch of species like halibut and crab and if any of these limits are reached, the flatfish fisheries will be closed regardless of how much is left of their quota.From its inception, ASC worked with the North Pacific Fishery Management Council to end the "race for fish and develop a safer, more responsible way to manage the fisheries. The resulting new system (Amendment 80) went into effect in 2008 and divides the groundfish target quotas and bycatch limits among cooperatives like ASC. This new management system makes each group responsible for its own catch and bycatch, and also provides strong incentives for the co-ops to keep bycatch rates low, maximize retention of target catches that can be marketed, and reward those who fish cleanly and efficiently.At industry expense, observer coverage aboard flatfish vessels was doubled from historic levels, resulting in the current standard of 200% coverage for the fleet. New flow scales were adopted that precisely account for everything that is caught. Additionally, fishermen collaborated with Federal scientists to reduce the impact of their nets, resulting in the fleets implementation of modified flatfish trawls that reduce seafloor contact by as much as 90% relative to older gear types.In 2010, the flatfish industry decided to pursue certification under the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), an internationally recognized body that provides third-party, objective certification of sustainable fisheries. MSC certification involves close and ongoing scrutiny through a transparent, science-based process to evaluate soundness of stock assessments, impacts of fishing on target and bycatch species as well as the overall ecosystem, and other metrics of sustainability. The flatfish fisheries were certified under the MSC guidelines in 2010, and this certification was renewed in 2015 and 2020. Additionally, several species of rockfish and Atka mackerel were certified by MSC in 2020.More recently, the ASC has been refining a program of deck sorting under an exempted fishing permit (EFP). This EFP allows for experimental fishing practices to be tested under the supervision of Federal scientists. The deck sorting EFP has allowed for halibut an important bycatch species to be returned to the water much faster than would be the case under normal regulations, greatly reducing halibut mortality. Deck sorting was made part of normal regulations beginning in the 2020 season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 55.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 11 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.