Alaska's Future Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810724994
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Seward, AK, USA
Phone
9074402205
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Civil Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$62,892
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Vince Beltrami (Vice President)
  • Ron Duncan (President)

People named in this filing

  • Steve Frank (Secretary)
  • Vince Beltrami (Vice President)
  • Ron Duncan (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the quality of life for all Alaskans by providing education and advocacy concerning policy issues impacting Alaska and the nation.

What it reported doing in 2019

Educating the Public: Alaska's Future is devoted to educating the public. Public education and information concerning the State of Alaska's fiscal gap, the implications of the same for future state services, the Alaska Permanent Fund, the earnings account of the permanent fund and the future of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend Program so that Alaskans understand the current situation and implications of the same for the future. This education and information message is communicated as widely as possible by means of earned and paid media, website, speeches, meetings, interviews, direct mail, newsletters and the like. It is undertaken by members, officers and agents of Alaska's Future. Making sure the public has an understanding of the fiscal gap and its implications are central to the effort to revise the current use of earnings of the Alaska Permanent Fund.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -113.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -62.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.