Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920162721
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Anchorage, AK, United States
- Phone
- 907-563-2662
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,292,751,441
- Expenses
- $1,106,247,707
- Assets
- $3,445,087,777
- Liabilities
- $2,192,020,316
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VALERIE J DAVIDSON (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 5/24))
- NATASHA V SINGH (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MATTHEW J SCHNELLBAECHER MED (DIR. CARDIOLOGY/PHYS. CARDIOLOGIST): $1,801,605 total reported compensation
- DWAIN STILSON (CFO): $1,646,135 total reported compensation
- VALERIE J DAVIDSON (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 5/24)): $1,490,380 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ms. Nollner serves on the Consortium’s Governance Executive Committee, Vice Chair; Ethics, Compliance, Quality and Safety Committee, Chair; Behavioral Health Committee, Chair; Joint Operating Board, Chair; and Volunteer Director for the Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation. Nollner is the CRNA Board President and Executive Director for the Native Village of Gakona. Bernice Kaigelak. Mission, Vision, Values Our Mission: Optimizing health and well-being through collaborative partnerships and services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Alaska native medical center - anmc is the largest operating division of the consortium and includes a 198-bed level ii trauma center (acute care facility), as well as significant multi-specialty, primary, and behavioral health care services. As a statewide referral center, anmc provides patient lodging, travel and related services through the operation of multiple lodging facilities in the anchorage, ak area. These facilities have a combined 644 patient lodging rooms.a significant portion of the program services above are supported by funding received from indian health service compact and other federal and state grants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 95%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.6%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.11; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 95% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.1B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.8M · 29 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $49.5M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 100 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 86 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.