Alaska Interior Marksmanship Committee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820567801
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Fairbanks, AK, USA
Phone
9074525837
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fishing, Hunting

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,880
Expenses
$59,662
Assets
$98,846
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GLENN MILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • ULISES GONZALEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DON LOGAN (VOTING MEMBER)
  • TONY DEL ROSARIO (VOTING MEMBER)
  • SYDNEY PACE (VOTING MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Alaska Interior Marksmanship Committee's (AIM-COMM) purpose is to foster the development of marksmanship, the safe and ethical use of firearms and to support and promote use of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game Hunter Education Indoor Shooting Range. AIM-COMM is a community organization of friendly, dedicated, Alaskans working together to foster the safe and responsible participation in hunting and the shooting sports and to help preserve and promote our heritage of hunting, shooting, and wildlife conservation.

What it reported doing in 2024

AIM-COMM currently offers a variety of shooting programs and structured activities plus educational classes that are available to the public including: Bullseye (NRA Precision Pistol) Shooting LeaguesNRA First Steps Pistol classesNRA CCW- Alaska Concealed Carry Handgun Permit ClassesNRA Basis Metallic Cartridge Reloading ClassesMillers Action Speed Shooting

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -85.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.