Alaska Crab Coalition Co Puget Sound Accounting

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911330080
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2062826996
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,059
Expenses
$189,778
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Alaska crab coalition was incorporated in 1986 to represent the bering sea crab vessel fleet and to promote the economic well being of the bering sea and aleutian islands crab industry, by actively advocating policies that encourage sustainability of the region's king and tanner crab resources.

What it reported doing in 2012

The Alaska crab coalition accomplishes its goals through representation at five week long meetings per year of the north pacific fishery management council, developing regulatory programs; usually one meeting a year with the state of Alaska board of fisheries on management regulations; one or two meetings per year as a participating member organization of the united fishermen of Alaska, advocating fisheries managment policies; one or two meetings per year participating as a member of the federally sanctioned pacific northwest crab industry advisory committee, making recommendations on programs, policies, regulations and scientific research; one or two meetings per year with the Alaska department of fish and game crab observer oversight task force; one or two meetings per year with the npfmc groundfish observer advisory committee, and two or three meetings per year with the north pacific research board advisory panel providing recommendations on new scientific research programs for north pacific fisheries.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -23.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -59.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.