Alaska Association on Developmental Disabilities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611440261
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Juneau, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9079571970
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $340,600
- Expenses
- $374,493
- Assets
- $257,364
- Liabilities
- $34,434
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amanda Faulkner (President)
- Cindy Hensley (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Kim Champney (Executive Dir.): $104,168 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purposes of this organization are to enhance the quality of life of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families by providing leadership and training that promotes and supports the following ServicePrinciples:1. All families and individuals with developmental disabilities receive services when needed.2. Individuals design, control, implement and identify the desired outcomes of their services.3. The Culture and Values of the individual determines and guides all supports and services.4. Services demonstrate respect for the rights, dignity, and safety of all individuals.5. Services result in community inclusion, achievement of life goals, and reduced dependence on the service system.6. A natural and enduring system of supports and personal relationships emerges from the effective delivery of services.7. Services foster communities where all members are included, respected and valued.
What it reported doing in 2024
FY25 8464.07 Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority (AMHTA) -- Advocate for strong system & best practices through involvement with national trends & organizations. Change management support for leadership in provider organizations. Provide for agency sustainability and workforce development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.4%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 51
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.4% of revenue deployed · 51.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $193K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.