Alaska Affiliated Crab Harvester Arbitration Organ

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203200798
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2068291814
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,012
Expenses
$5,459
Assets
$10,977
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • L John Iani (President)
  • Edward Poulsen (President Elect)

People named in this filing

  • L John Iani (President)
  • Edward Poulsen (President Elect)
  • Hip Prout (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Organization's primary exempt purpose is to serve as an arbitration organization for the affiliated Alaska crab harvesters in support of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations (NOAA) Bering Sea/Aleutian Island Crab Rationalization Program.

What it reported doing in 2025

Marine Conservation: The Organization fulfilled its role as an arbitration organization on behalf of 18 affiliated Alaska crab harvesters in support of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service Bering Sea/Aleutian Island crab rationalization program. For more information please refer to the following website: http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/crab/crfaq.htm. (0 0)

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.01; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.