Alano Club of Kalamazoo Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381870049
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Kalamazoo, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2693432711
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $81,950
- Expenses
- $64,393
- Assets
- $300,821
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERRY SULLIVAN (PRESIDENT)
- JUDY MARKUSE PAGET (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KIM MAYCROFT (PAST VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERRY SULLIVAN (PRESIDENT)
- JUDY MARKUSE PAGET (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN GRAY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide facilities for meetings and activities of alcoholics anonymous and other 12 step recovery groups
What it reported doing in 2023
Alano club provides buildings for meetings and social events for alcoholics anonymous, al-non, alateens, and adult children of alcoholics.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.9%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 54.6%; rating input score 55
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.4%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.67; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.9% of revenue deployed · 54.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.