Alano Club of Crystal Lake Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261733495
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Phone
8154550906
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,021
Expenses
$56,057
Assets
$261,347
Liabilities
$201,728

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATTIE SCHOMAKER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PATTIE SCHOMAKER (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID CLOUGH (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHRISTOPHER FRENCH (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the alano club of crystal lake shall be to maintain and operate a building to be used exclusively as a headquarters, meeting place, and social rooms for such members of alcoholics anonymous and allied activities as may wish to avail themselves of its services and facilities, and to help in carrying the message of the alcoholics anonymous fellowship to those suffering from the disease of alcoholism.

What it reported doing in 2024

The alano club of crystal lake (the club) strives to help in carrying the message of alcoholics anonymous fellowship to those suffering from the disease of alcoholism. The club does this by offering services to members and meetings of alcoholics anonymous in the form of a vending machine to purchase coffee, alcoholics anonymous literature and coins for purchase, a commemorative plaque wall, and the club also hosts an annual sober picnic to support the alcoholics anonymous fellowship. The club also offers a membership which grants access to the club at all hours of the day should recovering alcoholics need a place to go when there are no meetings offered.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.66; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $84K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.