Alameda Pfs Spv 1
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830601360
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4159670859
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Prison Alternatives
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN GROSSMAN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLINE WHISTLER (DIRECTOR): $335,678 total reported compensation
- TIM PENNELL (DIRECTOR): $236,888 total reported compensation
- OSCAR BENITEZ (VICE PRESIDE): $125,706 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is operated exclusively for the charitable purpose of assisting alameda county, ca with implementing and overseeing the county's performances based reimbursement program for charitable, non-profit organizations that provide support services and programs to low-income and needy individuals.
What it reported doing in 2023
The alameda project is designed to fund innovative and restorative solutions to stop the cycle of crime, incarceration, unemployment, and recidivism for individuals with trained coaches with simialr cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic backgrounds and developing a case managed plan for community re-entry. The alameda project will deliver eighteen months of consistent outreach and coaching, navigation support, and evidence-based therapies, intrinsic motivation, and substance use disorder treatments with the goal of meaningfully improving recidivism (re-arrest) outcomes, among other. The alameda project aims to serve approximately 175 participants between the ages of 18 and 34 throughout alameda county through the pilot.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -57.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 3 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $336K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.