Alameda County Mayors Conference
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941736302
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Leandro, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5105773360
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,365
- Expenses
- $59,257
- Assets
- $66,681
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Salinas (President)
- Juan Gonzalez (Vice President)
- Steven Bocian (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Mark Salinas (President)
- Juan Gonzalez (Vice President)
- Janelle Cameron (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Alameda County Mayors' Conference primary exempt purpose is to foster cooperation, understanding, and united action among city governments for local public welfare, regional problem-solving, and effective city-county relations, serving as a platform for sharing information, coordinating policy, and providing guidance on municipal issues. Essentially, it's a regional council of mayors working together on shared interests, like reviewing legislation and making recommendations for the greater good of Alameda County.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Alameda County Mayors' Conference (ACMC) focuses on regional cooperation, with recent accomplishments including advocating for Measure W funds for homelessness, supporting regional transportation plans (like Connect Bay Area), coordinating responses to housing/sea-level rise, and ensuring coordinated city/county action on issues like EMS contracts, all while mentoring new mayors and managing regional appointments for boards like MTC and ABAG.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.