Alachua Conservation Trust Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592919630
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Gainesville, FL, USA
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Land Resources Conservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,376,838
Expenses
$4,817,030
Assets
$39,438,679
Liabilities
$2,219,175

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM DAVIDSON (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS KAY (EXECUTIVE DI): $93,771 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of alachua conservation trust (act) is to protect the natural, historic, scenic and recreational resources in and around alachua county, Florida. Act protects land through purchase, donation, and conservation easements.

What it reported doing in 2024

Land protection: in 2024, act continued its robust land protection efforts. In january 2024, act closed on a first of its kind project with watson farm, where the landowner agreed to place a conservation easement on the property as well as reduce agricultural impacts to the land through a de-intensification schedule over the next ten years. Act also transferred 289 acres adjacent to manatee springs to the Florida division of state lands expanding the state park boundary and protecting land above the manatee springs cave system. Act's ongoing partnership with alachua county forever through the wild spaces & public places (wspp) program led to the protection of 614 acres through a conservation easement in january as well as an additional 478 acres in land protection from january through march. In june, act accepted the donation of 420 acres in madison county, which act will continue to manage long-term through prescribed fire and other techniques. Act also closed on a 261-acre tract in july along the northern portion of orange lake in alachua county further expanding efforts to protect land in the orange lake corridor, which includes other act-held nature preserves. This new addition will support water-based recreation along the lake. Throughout 2024, act facilitated several conservation projects for the state of Florida through its Florida forever program, including 290 acres in levy county in the watermelon pond conservation area, a 200-acre conservation easement in union county, a 1,500-acre conservation easement in columbia county, and a 538-acre conservation easement in gilchrist county. In august, act received a donated conservation easement on 55 acres nearby to its existing fox pen preserve. Through its partnership with alachua county forever, act staff assisted with a 120-acre acquisition in an area of high conservation priority known as lochloosa slough as well as a 40-acre conservation easement in the watermelon pond conservation area in september. At the end of 2024, act received several conservation easement donations including 26-acres within the ocala national forest in marion county, 22 acres in alachua county, and 94-acres in levy county which will provide for the perpetual protection of piney prairie. Act also continued to work with agricultural producers to protect their land through numerous state and federal programs including the usda-nrcs regional conservation partnership program, usda-nrcs acep-ale program, and the Florida department of agriculture and consumer services rural and family lands protection program (rflpp).

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $93.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 48.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.19; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.