Alabama Society of Dermatology Professionals
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822754692
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Vestavia Hills, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2059825500
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $402,445
- Expenses
- $384,865
- Assets
- $75,363
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHELSI DAVIS (PRESIDENT)
- ANNE TOWNSEND LOVE (PRESIDENT)
- ALISON PETERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ABBY MELTON (VICE PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)
People named in this filing
- CHELSI DAVIS (PRESIDENT)
- ANNE TOWNSEND LOVE (PRESIDENT)
- ALISON PETERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To represent dermatology physician assistants and nurse practitioners in the state of Alabama by serving as a collective voice to help build, strengthen, and maintain the physician-physician assistant/physician-nurse practitioners relationship, as well as relationships within the entire dermatology community, encourage professional and personal development by serving as a central resource for all currently practicing dermatology physician assistants and nurse practictioners, as well as physician assistants and nurse practicitioners with an interest in the medical specialty of dermatology, and support efforts that help Alabama's physician assistants and nurse practictioners improve access and quality of care in the specialty of dermatology.
What it reported doing in 2025
A continuing education meeting was held at the grand hotel on september 18- september 21, 2025. Its purpose was to provide up-to-date dermatology education for nurse practitioners and physician assistants working or interested in dermatology. Seventeen continuing education hours were available. Approximately 125 participants were in attendance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $366K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.