Alabama Partnership for Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 631287120
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Montgomery, AL, USA
- Phone
- 3345381094
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,132,749
- Expenses
- $18,684,589
- Assets
- $5,922,380
- Liabilities
- $401,863
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE M RAYBON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SEC)
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHANIE M RAYBON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SEC): $150,040 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all Alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
Early childhood health - help me grow Alabama is a program of the Alabama partnership for children as an affiliate of the help me grow national network. Help me grow Alabama is funded by the Alabama department of early childhood education through the preschool development grant, the Alabama department of human resources, and the Alabama department of mental health through a project launch grant from the substance abuse and mental health services association.the Alabama healthy kids, healthy future program works to develop key local, state and national partnerships around obesity prevention to ensure that existing programs and resources that impact early care and education programs are including efforts to intentionally and strategically reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity in young children.first 5 Alabama (f5a) works to nurture strong relationships among young children and all the adults who care for them. F5a is focused on promoting the healthy social and emotional development of all Alabama children from birth through age five. The program provides parents/caregivers and other people working with young children and their families (such as child care workers, home visitors, and pediatricians) the knowledge, skills, and practices that support healthy social and emotional development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.6% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $18.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 24 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 270 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 89 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.