Alabama Institute for Education in the Arts
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721358216
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Montgomery, AL, USA
- Phone
- 3343962432
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Humanities Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,962
- Expenses
- $143,169
- Assets
- $257,895
- Liabilities
- $5,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARGARET ALLEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VENNA EVERETT (EXECUTIVE DI)
- DR MARGARET ALLEN (PRESIDENT)
- MARY GEORGE JESTER (IMMEDIATE PA)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve quality of life for Alabama's children by providing intensive professional development in comprehensive and integrated arts for all educators.
What it reported doing in 2023
Aiea is a multi-arts organization that conducts professional development training in comprehensive discipline based arts education. Discipline based arts experts are hired from around the u.s. For summer institutes to present to master teachers, facilitators, and teaching artists. Professional Alabama artists are engaged to work with Alabama teachers at all institute training sessions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.3%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.8; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.