Alabama Clean Fuels Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134214691
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Birmingham, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2054022755
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Energy Resources Conservation and Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $805,526
- Expenses
- $624,395
- Assets
- $703,319
- Liabilities
- $48,292
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CASEY FOSTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CASEY FOSTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $95,572 total reported compensation
- HOLLIE JOHNSON (TREASURER): $14,900 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Primarily to encourage awareness of, development of, and public policies promoting alternative fuel and alternative fuel vehicles. Furthermore, the coalition is organized and may be expected to conduct any other purpose permissible under the articles of incorporation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Alternative fuel and vehicle usage and infrastructure projectsthe organization continued its participation in the u.s. Department of energy's (doe) clean cities program as a designated clean cities coalition. The program promotes the use of alternative fuels and advanced technology vehicles (afv) to expand the market for alternative fuels, create job opportunities, improve air quality, and to reduce dependence on foreign sources of energy. During 2024, acfc and its members and stakeholders worked to provide public and private individuals and entities with information on the benefits of afvs and to identify and implement afv uses and alternative fuel infrastructure projects. The use of alternative fuels was significant in Alabama in 2024 and provided a reduction in the use of petroleum of more than 18.4 million gallons of gasoline-gallon equivalent (gge) and 158,800 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, representing a 6.93% and 23.72% increase from the previous year, respectively. During 2024, alternative fuels (e85 ethanol, b20 biodiesel, and propane) continued to be included on the state fuel contract. In addition to being available to state agencies, these alternative fuels can be purchased by local governments from approved vendors in all 67 counties in Alabama. Acfc also serves as the ev consultant for the state of Alabama. Through these efforts, acfc assists the state of Alabama with electric vehicle (ev) infrastructure planning, which includes their plans for the national electric vehicle infrastructure (nevi) formula program as well as the Alabama electric vehicle charging infrastructure program. Additionally, acfc assisted with the development of the state's ev infrastructure grant application used by the state to select locations for the newly funded ev charging stations. Acfc programs and activities laid the foundation for additional alternative fuel infrastructure projects and increased the availability of cleaner-burning fuels to the public in Alabama during calendar year 2024 and beyond. Increasing availability of these fuels will improve air quality and support economic development and expansion opportunities. In addition, other potential projects were identified for future funding and/or technical assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $586K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.