Alabama Center for Adult Guardianships & Conservatorships Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874013740
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Montgomery, AL, USA
Phone
3344623011
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Revenue
$179,981
Expenses
$21,658
Assets
$163,151
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNA PRITCHETT (PRESIDENT)
  • GAINES BRAKE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELVIN WATTS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • DIANE DUNNING (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ANNA PRITCHETT (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop resources, provide education and training, research, and coordinate efforts to improve Alabama's adult guardianship and conservatorship system as a means of providing appropriate decision-making supports and protective services for individuals.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide education and training to attorneys, the judiciary, professionals, guardians, conservators, and the public on best practices in adult guardianships and conservatorships, as well as possible alternatives. Advocate for improvement in policies, processes, and practices as it relates to guardianships and conservatorships in Alabama. Serve as a resource for the judicial and legal community, for families and individuals with disabilities, professional organizations and state and local agencies. Collect and maintain statistical data and other information necessary to evaluate and make recommendations for improvement to Alabama's adult guardianship and conservatorship systems.5. To evaluate funding needs and identify means of funding for improving Alabama's adult guardianship and conservatorship systems.6. Support, evaluate or test policy proposals or programs to improve the adult guardianship system.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 92
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 12%; rating input score 12
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 88%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.53; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 12% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.