Alabama Association Regulatory Boards
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201433155
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Montgomery, AL, USA
- Phone
- 3343013507
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,504
- Expenses
- $91,772
- Assets
- $40,696
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Elizabeth Sheehan (President)
- Neva Conway (Vice President)
- Seth Gowan (Immediate Past President)
- Leslie Tomlin (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Elizabeth Sheehan (President)
- Neva Conway (Vice President)
- Lori Rall (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of AARB is to promote cooperation among all state regulatory agencies; to improve the quality and knowledge of professional and occupational regulation in Alabama; to provide educational and professional development for employees of the member boards; to increase public awareness of the existence of state regulatory boards and to serve as a clearinghouse of information to improve the consistency of administrative regulatory practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
AARB hosted a Leadership Conference, a Certified Investigator Training and quarterly Lunch and Learns in order to promote networking and provide educational and professional development for member boards.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.