Al-anon Family Groups of Georgia I
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581807321
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Macon, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4782543414
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,088
- Expenses
- $96,275
- Assets
- $119,954
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LOU ANN ALSHULER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LOU ANN ALSHULER (PRESIDENT)
- DENISE CURTIS (VICE PRESIDE)
- KRISTIN LEE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Al-anon is a mutual support program for people who are living with or have lived with someone whose drinking creasted problems for themselves or others.
What it reported doing in 2024
Al-anon family groups of Georgia: al-anon family groups of Georgia, inc. (known as area assembly) district representatives, group representatives, members, area officers and area coordinators attend to obtain information to carry back to the members of their respective district and group for the entire area. The area consists of all of the state of Georgia. The afg of Georgia, inc. Area assembly is a business meeting where changes in procedures, literature and program are discussed and put before the body for vote. Gr's represent the desires of the groups who have the ultimate responsibility and authority for the world wide service of al-anon. We also hold educational workshops, have fellowship, sell al-anon conference approved literature and plan area projects to help spread the message of al-anon throughout the state by way of its membership. The number of people served varies. Those in attendance are not the only people served. I would estimate the number served by taking the number of groups in the area and multiply by the average (10) members. This reflects approximately 3,000 (more or less) persons who would be served and benefit from the subject matter of the assembly.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.