Akwa Ibom State Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943470942
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4043840014
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,078
- Expenses
- $37,879
- Assets
- $80,200
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Clement Asuquo (President)
People named in this filing
- Clement Asuquo (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In 2025, the organization delivered a series of impactful community focused initiatives that strengthened cultural identity, enhanced social cohesion, and provided essential support to vulnerable individuals. The years activities centered on cultural celebration, national commemoration, charitable outreach, and compassionate care. The Akwa Ibom Cultural Day Celebration served as a major highlight, promoting cultural preservation and unity through vibrant displays of tradition and community participation. The Independence Day Celebration further reinforced national pride and civic engagement, bringing together diverse groups in a shared spirit of patriotism. The organization expanded its humanitarian footprint through a charity visitation to Solomon Temple, offering material assistance and emotional support to individuals and families in need. Additional community care efforts included providing funeral support to bereaved households, ensuring dignity and comfort during periods of loss.
What it reported doing in 2025
N 2025, the organization delivered a series of impactful community focused initiatives that strengthened cultural identity, enhanced social cohesion, and provided essential support to vulnerable individuals. The years activities centered on cultural celebration, national commemoration, charitable outreach, and compassionate care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.7%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.9%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.