Akron Metro Futbol Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261547985
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Akron, OH, USA
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,692
Expenses
$98,248
Assets
$54,906
Liabilities
$11,699

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLES VAN RIPER (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC FULLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID REYMANN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHARLES VAN RIPER (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC FULLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHELA OBERLIN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To establish and maintain and operate and promote sports and activities for youth soccer at all levels of play to encourage citizenship and good sportsmanship in all activities and to promote and protect sponsorand amateur athletics

What it reported doing in 2017

Over 500 youth participated in youth athletics soccer at various levels of play instilling good sportsmanship cooperation fellowship and loyalty in young athletes youths of all gender ethnic background religion and abiltiy were able to work together to acheive a common goal 13271 in partial scholarship dollars were awarded to individual athletes to offset cost of participation

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.