Akima Gives
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934065094
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Herndon, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5715210855
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $127,412
- Expenses
- $5,000
- Assets
- $141,642
- Liabilities
- $5,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LARRY MECHNER (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ALEX ANDRUSYSZYN (TREASURER/DIRECTOR)
- ELIZABETH JOHNSON (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
- LARRY MECHNER (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To raise funds to support initiatives for the advancement of the health, safety, culture, welfare and economic benefit of the inupiat shareholders of nana regional corporation, inc. ("nana"), an Alaska native corporation. To develop programs to further the education of nana's Alaska native shareholders in primary and secondary education models and support charities of interest to nana throughout the united states.
What it reported doing in 2024
Funds will be used to support charitable causes in the nana region of Alaska, including establishment of scholarship at the university of Alaska and support for local cultural programs such as qatnut trade fair and kattivik camp.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.9%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 96.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 28.33; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.