Akeso Community Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931520698
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- North Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8778295500
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,277,260
- Expenses
- $5,986,572
- Assets
- $290,688
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIET DE LA OSA (PRESIDENT & CHAIR)
- WILLIAM MATIAS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR LUIS A PEREZ (CMO): $357,993 total reported compensation
- WILLIAM MATIAS (CEO): $227,998 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Akeso's mission is to commit to being a committed continued resource to the community and its members who are in need, we commit to empowering our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Akeso provides exceptional medical care for all individuals living with HIV, regardless of their ability to pay. We are committed to providing comprehensive care, prioritizing the holistic well-being and empowerment of every individual we serve. Our services include: lgbtq+ primary care; HIV specialty care; transgender care; std treatments; HIV and sti testing, screening, and treatment; prep and pep; sexual health; and endothelial testing. The following are ways that akeso was actively involved in the fight against HIV/AIDS during 2024: accessible care: we provided comprehensive and compassionate care for all individuals living with HIV, regardless of their ability to pay. We served 1,124 non-duplicated patients in 2024. Most of these patients were seen several times throughout the year as prep/HIV patients are generally seen every three months. Prep & pep: we offered prep and pep to qualified patients, helping prevent new infections. We are dedicated to ending the HIV epidemic through the widespread adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) and the attainment of undetectable HIV status among affected individuals. By promoting access to prep as a powerful preventive measure and supporting those living with HIV to achieve and maintain an undetectable viral load, we aim to drastically reduce new HIV infections and improve the health outcomes of those affected by the virus. Sti screenings: we provided free sti screenings and treatment for uninsured and underinsured patients. Education and counseling: our team provided education and counseling services to empower individuals to make informed decisions about their sexual health. Community engagement: we collaborated with local communities to raise awareness, reduce stigma, and promote testing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $358K · 5 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $545K reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.