AISHA N Postpartum Depression AWARENESS FOUNDATION
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474442308
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3214997106
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,500
- Expenses
- $1,500
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Maria D Fontanez (CEO and Founder)
- Isha D Cotto (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Maria D Fontanez (CEO and Founder)
- Isha D Cotto (Vice President)
- Oscar Fontanez Velazquez (Transportation Specialist)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We create awareness of Postpartum Depression, we do not make profits through sales, or have any salaries currently. What we receive in donations goes back to the community by helping those mothers in need, mostly material rather than monetary.
What it reported doing in 2019
In 2019 we had more acceptance for our online private support group, we reached a total of 62 members and increased the number of followers both on Facebook and our website. Mothers from not only U.S.A. have contacted us, but also mothers from different countries and we are eager to reach more in our community along with their families as we have included information for fathers who also suffer from this illness as we state in our website and group that not only the mother suffers from this illness but also those around her. We acquired a new Marketing Director from Texas and will integrate her in the 2020 Certificate of Status. We are receiving several reports of mothers who are currently suffering from this illness in the State of Texas which makes us increase our reach to that zone and look forward to expanding to that state to create awareness there as well.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 64.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.