Aish Tamid of Los Angeles
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900086051
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3236340505
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $681,010
- Expenses
- $424,392
- Assets
- $2,724,793
- Liabilities
- $1,515,520
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ronald Mayer (President)
People named in this filing
- Ronald Mayer (President)
- James Levy (CFO)
- Frank Menlo (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. Religious Services - religiousservices for its congregants by its affiliated Rabbis according to the rituals andcustoms of the Orthodox Jewish tradition.2.Religious Worship - Prayer Services are conducted by affiliated Rabbis andReligious practitioners on site in the evenings.3.Individual Counseling - Affiliated Rabbis will utilize the organization's physicalresources to provide young adults in the community with individual, counseling underthe approach and auspices of Orthodox Jewish theory, custom, and outlook.4.Rabbinic and Legal Advisory Services - Rabbis are available to assist congregantsand anyone else interested with study partners to explore and study the Bible andother religious texts.5. Aish Tamid's Alcohol & Drug Rehabilitation Program has provided support andintervention to students in need of resources, support and counseling in theirbattles with alcohol and other addictive substances. In addition, Aish Tamidcurrently employs a substance abuse counselor and a social wo
What it reported doing in 2024
Program Services are listed above. All Program Expenses are directly related to the listed services in that statement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.4%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.42; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.4% of revenue deployed · 63.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $268K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.