Airbnborg Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833135259
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4159884910
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,494,033
- Expenses
- $32,267,825
- Assets
- $53,549,278
- Liabilities
- $15,951,107
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPH GORDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOCELYN WYATT (DIRECTOR): $22,500 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER BOND (SECRETARY (UNTIL 05/2025), DIRECTOR): $22,500 total reported compensation
- SHARYANNE MCSWAIN (DIRECTOR): $22,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Airbnb.org's mission is to unlock the power of sharing space, resources and support in times of need. Airbnb.org works with communities and nonprofit partners to offer emergency temporary housing.
What it reported doing in 2025
Airbnb.org provides free, welcoming, short-term stays with the comforts of home to people impacted by natural and civil disasters, residential fires, and other emergencies, and to the critical workers responding to those emergencies. In 2025, airbnb.org worked with nonprofit partners, governments, and hosts to fund and facilitate free stays and help communities recover through grants and direct assistance for thousands of people in response to the los angeles wildfires, central Texas floods, hurricane melissa, and other disasters, conflicts and crises globally.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,487.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 99.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $22K · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $110K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.