Aim at Melanoma

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562427805
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9167060599
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,671,461
Expenses
$2,057,724
Assets
$7,268,877
Liabilities
$7,982

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA GUILD (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
  • ALICIA ROWELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SAMANTHA GUILD (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR): $241,093 total reported compensation
  • ALICIA ROWELL (VICE PRESIDENT): $160,508 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Aim at melanoma (aim) is globally engaged and locally invested in advancing the battle against melanoma through innovative research, legislative reform, education, and patient and caregiver support. Founded in 2004, aim at melanoma is the largest international melanoma foundation seeking the cure for melanoma. Aim believes that the cure for melanoma will be found more quickly by bringing together leading global researchers and funding their collaborative research. Our three paradigm-shifting global research initiatives, including the melanoma tissue bank consortium, are poised to reshape the future of melanoma. Aim is the respected voice of melanoma across the nation. When drugs are approved, legislation is drafted, and research is assessed, aim is at the table, speaking loudly and clearly on behalf of patients and their families. Aim is the trusted advisor for pharmaceutical companies, medical boards, and government agencies on critical topics that affect melanoma patients.

What it reported doing in 2025

Websiteaim at melanoma ("aim") is the largest international organization engaged in a wide range of global patient advocacy initiatives for the purpose of raising awareness about melanoma and supporting those impacted by the disease by providing comprehensive education, advocating for patients and their families, and funding collaborative research initiatives. Among our most important contributions to the melanoma community is the ownership and maintenance of the most comprehensive u.s. Website on melanoma (www.aimatmelanoma.org). In 2025, aim continued to create website content for the purpose of meeting the needs of the melanoma community. This included, but was not limited to, making it easier for users to identify pertinent information to assist them in better understanding their melanoma diagnosis and staging, treatment options, clinical trial opportunities, recognition and management of the side effects of treatment, risk of recurrence, follow-up care, and the psychosocial aspects of the disease. The organization continued to use various methods, such as search engine optimization, social media, and brochures distributed to healthcare providers throughout the u.s, and other regions of the world and to broaden our reach and to educate patients and their families about the website's resources. The website was updated regularly for medical accuracy in order to reflect the current standard of care in melanoma and with content related to issues facing the melanoma community. As part of aim's commitment to equity in melanoma education, aim invested in global accessibility, making sure language was not a barrier to lifesaving information. Among other things, aim's website was configured for multiple languages, providing full-site translation so that the information could reach a broader audience. Aim also started the process of translating many educational materials into spanish. Aim's website alone had around 100,000 unique visitors each month. This is an increase from 2024. Approximately half of the website's traffic came from outside of the U.S.patient advocacythroughout 2025, aim continued to provide a free oncology physician assistant on call service through its ask an expert initiative. Patients with melanoma, caregivers, and families reached out to ask questions about, among other things, their/their loved one's melanoma diagnosis, treatment options, clinical trials, side effect management, and follow-up care as well as questions regarding prevention and early detection of the disease. Aim continued to coordinate numerous patient advocacy events, which included 10 patient and caregiver symposia led by nationally recognized oncologists who specialize in melanoma at major cancer centers such as sidney comprehensive cancer at johns hopkins, Michigan rogel comprehensive cancer center, carbone cancer center at uw-madison and upmc hillman cancer center. The symposia are offered as hybrid events so that individuals can attend in-person but can also watch via live stream. Aim also videotaped and edited these symposia, which were then uploaded onto youtube and aim's website so they could be viewed by individuals in the u.s. And worldwide at any time. Aim continued to provide support for patients, families, and survivors through a program called peer connect. Peer connect is a peer-to-peer support program, aim at melanoma's answer to the ongoing need for support in the melanoma community. Patients with melanoma, family members, and caregivers who join the program are matched with a peer, and from there the pair communicate in a way that is comfortable for both. Members of peer connect provide each other with knowledge, experience, emotional support, and more. In response to a first-ever fda-approved treatment option using til therapy, aim developed a peer-to-peer program specific to this patient population by matching "mentors" to those undergoing the therapy to guide others in self-advocacy, and provide meaningful emotional suppo

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $241K · 6 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.