Aiken Kidney Benefit Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570906899
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Aiken, SC, USA
Phone
8036493102
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Kidney Disease

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,525
Expenses
$16,356
Assets
$11,363

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BOBBY WALKER (President)
  • CATHY STAHURA (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • LYNN BURKES (Treasurer)
  • BOBBY WALKER (President)
  • CATHY STAHURA (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization produces an annual benefit show and/or an annual benefit run to raise money to disburse to, and for, needy patients with kidney disease. The number of individuals effected varies from year to year; average between 5-25.

What it reported doing in 2015

The purpose of the organization is to receive and disburse monies for the benefit of persons suffering from end-stage renal disease being treated by aiken, sc, edgefield, sc and barnwell, sc clinics, and those suffering from kidney disease in the aiken, sc area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.9%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -547.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.9% of revenue deployed · 4.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $756 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.