Aiken County Community Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861277497
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Aiken, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8035221515
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,560
- Expenses
- $49,947
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Terry Scott (President)
- Martha Ebel (Vice President Programs)
- Kevin Kalbaugh (Vice President Membership)
People named in this filing
- Terry Scott (President)
- Martha Ebel (Vice President Programs)
- Kevin Kalbaugh (Vice President Membership)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Education, Literacy, Life Skills Development
What it reported doing in 2023
Other Program Services (Line 31): Consists of additional grants totaling $21,250 during the tax period to the following entities to accomplish mission purposes - 1) $7,000 - Mental Health America of Aiken County (Nurture Home), 2) $7,500 - PFLAG Aiken, 3) $2,250 - Hospital Auxiliary of Aiken County (Reach Out & Read Program), 4) $1,500 - Aiken Partnership of University of South Carolina Educational Foundation, 5) $1,500 - Aiken Technical College Foundation, 6) $750 - Guide Educate Motivate (GEM) Program, 7) $500 - Aiken Chamber of Commerce (New Public Educator Gifts), 8) $250 - Aiken Technical College Nursing Club. A portion of these grants were given as part of dissolution activities and are also included on Schedule N.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,303%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.