AIDS Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391548528
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6082526540
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,709,228
- Expenses
- $1,813,266
- Assets
- $1,047,855
- Liabilities
- $183,928
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARY VASQUEZ (PRESIDENT)
- KEVIN HUBBARD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAN GUINN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DAN GUINN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $75,600 total reported compensation
- SUZANNE GILLINGHAM (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $68,587 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
AIDS network leads the fight against HIV/AIDS by providing integrated prevention, health, and support services to the communities of southern Wisconsin.
What it reported doing in 2014
AIDS network's prevention initiatives focus on reducing the behaviors associated with HIV and hepatitis c transmission through education and providing the facts about how HIV/hcv is transmitted with public and individual outreach and education; distribution of safer sex supplies; HIV/hepatitis c counseling, testing, and referral; sexually transmitted infection counseling and referral; alcohol and other drug addiction referral; prevention focus support groups; and needle exchange. These prevention initiatives aim to reduce barriers to early diagnosis of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases. AIDS network provided prevention services to about 12,000 people through these initiatives. Education and motivating people to make good and conscious choices to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS remains our challenge.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 75.6%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 75.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.