AIDS Interfaith Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752241382
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
2149434444
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health
Affiliation
Interfaith

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,100,574
Expenses
$2,894,357
Assets
$1,409,138
Liabilities
$787,113

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Yolanda Jones (Chief Executive Officer CEO)
  • Michael Weinstein (President, AHF)

Highest reported compensation

  • Yolanda Jones (Chief Executive Officer CEO): $159,506 total reported compensation
  • Joni Wysocki (Chief Operating Officer COO): $112,331 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Aids Interfaith Network, Inc. AIN works to prevent the spread of HIV, and serves persons living with HIV and other vulnerable populations.

What it reported doing in 2025

During 2025 AIN served 1,082 AIN enrolled clients 160 non-AIN enrolled clients seen through Case Management for a total of 1,242 individuals living with HIV/AIDS annually through a range of support service programs, while also reaching about 2,000 at-risk individuals with outreach and prevention services via community events and partnerships. Through care coordination, clients receive essential services that help them access and maintain Ryan White eligibility for funded support. The Referral for Healthcare and Support Services program facilitated 7,913 units over 1,960 visits client interactions, ensuring access to critical resources tailored to their needs and fostering continuity of care. AINs Non-Medical and Medical Case Management programs conducted 586 units over 108 visits case management sessions, guiding clients in retaining medical care and navigating necessary support services across the HIV healthcare system.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $160K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.