Aidmore Auxiliary
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 586045084
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Conyers, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7704833535
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,050
- Expenses
- $4,782
- Assets
- $13,028
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JoAnne Bennett (President Elect)
- Barbara Burnett (President)
People named in this filing
- JoAnne Bennett (President Elect)
- Barbara Burnett (President)
- Stephanie West (VP NE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Georgia Elks Auxiliary is an integrated supporting organization of the Georgia Elks Association with requirements of being a spouse or a widow of an Elks member in good standing. Both Auxiliary and Elks meet 3 times a year, Spring, Fall and Annually to conduct business jointly and separately. The Auxiliary collects membership dues in the spring to budget for the operation of the organization. Funds are raised to support Aidmore through several projects and donations from local Auxiliaries. These funds are given to Aidmore at the Spring meeting and any funds left over from the membership dues is presented at the Fall meeting , after the books are audited. Elks Aidmore has a residential program in Conyers, Ga. for young women 12-21 years of age, who have been removed from their homes, to provide safe housing, education, training and life skills.
What it reported doing in 2024
Housing Grants
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 65% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.6%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.72; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 65.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.