Ahahui Malama I Ka Lokahi
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990327326
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Kailua, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8082638008
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,523
- Expenses
- $160,022
- Assets
- $20,238
- Liabilities
- $11,880
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES LEHUAKONA ISAACS JR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHARLES LEHUAKONA ISAACS JR (PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN LEE MONTGOMERY PHD (TREASURER)
- LAUREN CARTER-ROTH VENU (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To practice, promote, and perpetuate a modern native hawaiian conservation ethic that provides for a healthy hawaiian ecosystem nurtured by human communities and serving as a model for local and global resource management.
What it reported doing in 2019
Jdai youth program - healing land and spirit. The goal of this program is to provide a culturally positive experience that directly benefits the adjudicated youth from the youth correctional facility. Their work provides a benefit to the community by restoring and maintaining our land and for themselves as they learn new skills and increased self worth - all within the context of the organization's malama aina work.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.8%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 34.4%; rating input score 34
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -50.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.8% of revenue deployed · 34.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.