Ah of Monroe County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592678740
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Key West, FL, USA
Phone
3052966196
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
AIDS

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,818,421
Expenses
$5,143,354
Assets
$14,843,922
Liabilities
$9,949,950

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT PRIDGEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • REBECCA BALCER (PRESIDENT)
  • LAURIE MCCHESNEY (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SCOTT PRIDGEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $237,744 total reported compensation
  • ESNEIDER GOMEZ (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $202,214 total reported compensation
  • MARK TISCHLER (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $182,407 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To establish and maintain in monroe county, Florida, a corporation that will provide case managed healthcare, food programs, counseling, housing, clinical, and other supportive and volunteer services;(continued on schedule o)increase affordable housing by acquiring, developing, and maintaining low income housing for persons in need; and conducting health education and linkage to care.

What it reported doing in 2024

Client assistance: served 295 unique clients in monroe county, Florida including 48 intakes during the 12 month period. 5 medical case managers and 2 intensive case managers had 5,578 contacts with clients during the 12 month period. Core services provided through contract funding and fundraising were ambulatory outpatient/physician services - 56 clients served; dental care - 85 clients served; health insurance premiums copays and deductible - 87 clients served; mental health therapy - 22 clients served - medical nutritional therapy 38 clients served; and medical case management - 295 clients served supportive services provided included housing assistance - 46 clients served; nutritional assistance 210 clients served; medical transportation - 93 (continued on schedule o) clients served emergency assistance - 39 clients served. During the year 100% of the individuals newly diagnosed with HIV were linked to clinical care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $642.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.89; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $238K · 18 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.