Agnus Dei Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371692998
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Escondido, CA, USA
Phone
7602947969
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services for Adolescent Parents
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$376,575
Expenses
$529,534
Assets
$1,609,027
Liabilities
$32,161

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NATALIE SUMMERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • GRACE DULANEY (President & CEO)
  • KIRK DULANEY (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • NATALIE SUMMERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $90,925 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of AGNUS DEI FOUNDATION (ADF) is to impact the culture of life by being a champion for adoption as an alternative to abortion or single parenting for women in crisis.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, agnus dei foundation (adf) provided direct care to 15 residents in our homes in California and Utah. During their time at the home, residents received individualized care plans, prenatal and postpartum support, professional mental health counseling, financial literacy training, education assistance and job readiness coaching. These holistic services empowered residents to develeop practical life skills, emotional resilience and confidence as they prepared for the birth of their child and independent living.by residing with other women who are choosing open adoption as their parenting choice, and attending adoption classes, our residents are educated to make the most informed decision for themselves and their babies. Many of our residents successfully completed the program and transitioned into stable housing and employment.in addition to the women who lived at the maternity home, we supported over 425+ women through our two 24/7 crisis phone lines, by directing them to other community resources that could provide for their specific individual needs and situations.the Utah home, which opened in 2023, expanded its community partnerships with local service providers including open doors, good futures and safe harbor crisis center, to provide trauma-informed care and coordinated entry for women at risk of homelessness.it is our belief that open adoption is a direct help not only to the birth mother and child, but also to society. With open adoptions, the birthmothers choose the adoptive parents and have access to their child. Adoption makes a generational impact in the areas of poverty, trauma and the tragedy of children becoming part of the foster care system. By helping both mother and child, the financial burden on society at large is lessened.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.04; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $383K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.