Aging Concerns Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930979488
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- West Linn, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5036367989
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,381
- Expenses
- $23,033
- Assets
- $4,072
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIM NAY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TIM NAY (PRESIDENT)
- VICKI L SCHMALL (EXECUTIVE DI)
- BOBBY HEAGERTY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Training and education for family care givers, older adults, and practioners who work with elders and families.
What it reported doing in 2025
Training/education materials developed and reviewed: -reviewed/evaluated manuscript as potential articles for geriatric nursing -reviewed/updated publication, coping with caregiving: how to manage stress when caring for the elderly, for Oregon state university extension service -reviewed montguides for the Montana state university extension service -consulted with individuals and families about aging-related concerns involving family members; held family meetings with families faced with concerns and/or decisions about an aging family member; and worked with elders around aging related concerns and/or decisions. -did all the work needed, including major down-sizing, to prepare three women who were making major moves from their homes. Once they moved (the actual move was done by a moving company), i organized and put everything away in their new setting. For one woman i did this three times, twice after a major fall when care was needed. -consulted with professionals and practitioners via telephone, email and in-person about aging-related issues, family and caregiving concerns, and resources/training materials. -completed online and in-person training for "we need to talk" training offered by aarp driver safety program so that i can teach this program. -worked with the coordinator of the 48th annual osu gerontology conference to identify topics and speakers for the conference, which was held for just one day in april this year. -prepared monthly program meetings information for 2025-26 booklet for the columbia hehc (home economics in home and community), april-june. -conducted peer interviews of potential aarp volunteers and wrote up my perspective and evaluation of the prospective aarp volunteers. -met monthly with members of hope dementia support group, vancouver, wa. -worked with aarp in regard to family caregiving programs for 2025. -participated in lobby day at the state capitol. It included attending an informational hearing on aging-related issues, and visiting with elected officials. -served on aarp Oregon speakers bureau.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.