Aggregate Ready Mix of Minnesota

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410989986
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Eagan, MN, USA
Phone
9527071250
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,302,149
Expenses
$1,286,456
Assets
$437,934
Liabilities
$198,260

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN CUNNINGHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KYLE BECKEN (PRESIDENT)
  • BILL FRAZIER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MONTE KERZMAN (PAST PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN CUNNINGHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $186,467 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Arm is committed to the aggregate and ready mixed industries to make concrete the construction material of choice through promotion, education, environment, and government issues.

What it reported doing in 2024

Arm members and the arm executive director worked with the legislative consulting firm, flaherty & hood, to represent arm members at the Minnesota legislature, state agencies and local government bodies on regulatory and public policy issues impacting the aggregate and ready mix industries in Minnesota. Arm contracts with larkin hoffman attorneys to represent members' interests with the Minnesota pollution control agency (mpca). Arm supports funding for dnr aggregate resource mapping program.the association accomplishes its work through a committee structure that oversees a number of major initiatives. Arm's environment & land use committee continues to be engaged in the development and review of new regulatory rules. This committee works closely with the mpca, and dnr in Minnesota. Arm participates in educational workshops and statewide conferences designed to increase public awareness of the aggregate mining industry in Minnesota and the uses and benefits of dependable local sources of aggregate products. Arm supports the Minnesota center for mineral resource education (mcmre) a 501(c)(3) charitable education organization focused on supporting k-12 science teachers understanding of the minerals industry in Minnesota through annual Minnesota minerals education workshops (mmew). Arm staff serves on the Minnesota minerals coordinating committee.the technical committee monitors new technology in the aggregate and ready mixed concrete industries at the direction of the arm board of directors and works with state and local agencies to educate regulators on the benefits of performance standards for construction materials. Arm also supports research projects including concrete pavement research at the mnroad pavement research facility (mnroad) concrete pavement research through the national concrete pavement technology center, and participates on the national road research alliance (nrra). Arm staff serves on the research advisory council of the rmc research and education foundation, and on the program coordination group for the airport concrete pavement technology program. Arm's board of directors established a safety committee in fy2025 to assist member companies with compliance and safety efforts. The committee works to promote a safe working environment at mines, pits, quarries, plants, and job sites. Much of the committee's fy2025 efforts have centered on sharing best management practices.the arm board of directors is elected annually at the annual membership meeting of the association in december. The board of directors meets four times a year to review the work of its committees, review financial statements, develop annual budgets and approve annual work plans for the association. The executive committee consists of the president, vice president, past president, treasurer and such additional members as may be appointed by the board of directors. Subject to the control and direction of the board of directors, the executive committee may act on behalf of the association during the intervals between the regular quarterly meetings of the board of directors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $186K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.