Agassiz Village Founded by Mr & Mrs Harry E Burroughs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042160531
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Framingham, MA, USA
Phone
7818600200
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,260,844
Expenses
$1,628,294
Assets
$5,192,472
Liabilities
$79,734

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA CARTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • BEN KERN (PRESIDENT)
  • JONATHAN GILLIM (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LISA CARTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $157,709 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL SMITH (DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT): $118,209 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o.

What it reported doing in 2025

Agassiz village operates a 330-acre overnight summer enrichment camp serving approximately 475 children and teens ages 817 from underresourced communities across greater boston and Maine. The program provides a safe, structured, and joyful environment where youth build confidence, independence, and socialemotional skills through handson learning and outdoor adventure. In addition to our flagship summer enrichment camp, agassiz village delivers the ithrive summer leadership program for teens and the yearround ithrive college and career readiness program, creating a comprehensive continuum of support from childhood through early adulthood.in 2025, agassiz village continued to expand access to high quality youth development programming while rebuilding to pre pandemic participation levels. Nearly 500 children and teens engaged in summer programming, with more than 98% coming from families living at or below 300% of the federal poverty level.program highlights include: - enhanced sel and mental health supports, including increased staff training, expanded trauma informed practices, and dedicated behavioral support roles. - growth in the ithrive leadership program, with teens participating in workforce development workshops, community service projects, and leadership challenges on the low ropes course. - year round college and career readiness, including job shadowing, resume development, interview preparation, and post secondary planning. - expanded partnerships with boston public schools, community centers, and youth serving organizations to identify and support youth with the highest needs.agassiz village's 330 acre campus provides a unique environment for experiential learning, allowing youth to build confidence, independence, and a sense of belonging.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 69%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.19; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $158K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.