Agak Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

3 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To empower orphaned and underprivelaged children by offerin academic scholarships

Educational funds to pay school fees in kenya and running the foundation

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: Limited
Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 95.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 56.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 4 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 9 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Assets line sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.