Aft Pennsylvania
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251035208
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2155876784
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,605,472
- Expenses
- $2,280,595
- Assets
- $5,229,971
- Liabilities
- $1,158,659
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
39 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH ROBBINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CYNDI BOLDEN (VICE PRESIDENT AT-LARGE)
- NINA ESPOSITO-VIGITIS (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- ART STEINBERG (PRESIDENT)
- SUZANNE CATHLINE (PHILADELPHIA VICE PRESIDENT)
- ED OLSEN (PHILADELPHIA VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WALT MICHALSKI (STAFF REPRESENTATIVE): $128,152 total reported compensation
- CAROL MINTUS (STAFF REPRESENTATIVE): $127,604 total reported compensation
- SARAH ROBBINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $118,165 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Funds are raised to hire staff to provide services such as contract negotiations, grievance processing, strike activities and organizing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.5%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 30 of 32 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 39 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $177K reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.