African Peoples Education and Defense Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593252727
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
Phone
7278212437
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$381,923
Expenses
$556,690
Assets
$2,478,158
Liabilities
$633,426

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ONA ZENE YESHITELA (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ONA ZENE YESHITELA (PRESIDENT): $14,300 total reported compensation
  • KITTY REILLY (SECRETARY): $6,670 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Develop and institutionalize programs to defend the human and civil rights of the african community, and to address the grave disparities in education, health, healthcare and economic development faced by african people.

What it reported doing in 2025

Community and housing programs: apedf operates uhuru freedom house community centers along with programs for economic development, health, community engagement and cultural fulfillment in historically underserved areas of st. Petersburg, fl, st. Louis, mo, oakland, ca and philadelphia, pa. Our work improves the lives and living conditions of black people by building resilient communities that engage in grass-roots decision making, promote community-based leadership and actively engage in collective solutions. Apedfs programming is a template for community transformation and intended to be replicated nationwide. In 2025, apedfs keystone community transformation and anti-gentrification program, the black power blueprint of st. Louis, continued development and revitalization in one of the most impoverished neighborhoods of st. Louis, a 98% black community where 60% of residents live at or below the poverty line and one third live in deep poverty. St. Louis ranks eighth in the nation for racial disparities in poverty. The black power blueprint has built a series of interconnected community-based programs and spaces. Its economic impact has inspired and enabled current and previous residents to stay or move back to the historically black northside, reversing the trend where st. Louis has the 8th most severe population decrease among major cities in the last decade. Our st. Louis black power vanguards community basketball court, previously the site of a condemned building, continues to provide recreation, fitness and youth programing to improve physical and mental health, teamwork, social skills and community cohesion for youth and adults. We held our 6th annual st. Louis childrens halloween festival in 2025 to strengthen community ties and provide a safe celebration space for children. In 2025, the apedfs black power blueprint completed two residential properties for affordable housing rentals for northside residents of st. Louis and began renovation on a commercial property for retail sales. This continues our commitment to community-based development in a city with an estimated 25,000 vacant homes, where one in every three in north st. Louis is abandoned due to discriminatory housing policies, suburban flight and industrial collapse. After an ef3 tornado destroyed thousands of homes and devastated areas of north st. Louis on 5/18/25, apedf quickly engaged our n2u volunteer brigade, hosting 35 volunteer workdays in 24 weeks. We recruited and coordinated over 450 volunteers who prepared meals. They solicited, received and distributed emergency food and supplies to residents, provided an electric charging station, and cleared over 2,000 pounds of brick debris, 6,000 pounds of roof debris and 300,000 pounds of tree debris. Apedf provided tornado recovery information and resources for home repairs, power restoration and emergency support. Apedf representatives also attended nine public meetings advocating for public funds to support disaster relief and the overall revitalization of north st. Louis. In total, apedfs volunteer program engaged more than 700 volunteers to help improve conditions in north st. Louis. These individual and corporate volunteers participated in more than 50 community workdays assisting with gardening, grant writing, food service, educational presentations, program promotions, community outreach, research and logistics. Apedfs volunteer internship programs provided 3 participants with on-the-job training in leadership and building soft skills. In december 2025 apedf hosted our 4th annual n2u heart and soul volunteer appreciation national event, recognizing 56 award nominees from all over the country. The n2u volunteer brigade offers people of all ages and abilities the opportunity to reduce the disparities faced by the black community. Vounteers bring their resources and skills to participate in making progress toward a positive future where north st. Louis has sustainable self-determination, economic developmen

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 56
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -45.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.45; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $437K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $14K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.