African Parks Foundation of America

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300241904
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
6465681276
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,916,477
Expenses
$54,746,094
Assets
$80,496,179
Liabilities
$16,432

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LIAM DALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • LIAM DALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $398,380 total reported compensation
  • JOANNA DA VEIGA (DIRECTOR, FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION): $207,594 total reported compensation
  • MORGAN PECORA-SAIPE (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $181,577 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment and infrastructure; 2) scouring donations towards the endowment of the african parks foundation to enable it to continue its work in perpetuity; 3) facilitating grant aid from the us government for specific projects by african parks, and to be the manager of such funds; 4) promoting the work of african parks in the u.s. And to be a source of information on its projects.

What it reported doing in 2024

Rhino rewild initiative: in 2024, african parks advanced one of the most ambitious species restoration efforts on earth, continuing the translocation and reintroduction of southern white rhinos through its 10-year rhino rewild campaign. The program was launched to prevent the dispersal of the world's largest captive rhino population and to return these keystone animals to well-managed protected areas across the continent. With support from multiple partners, african parks successfully moved 40 rhinos to munyawana conservancy in kwazulu-natal, a reserve jointly managed by community and private stakeholders. An additional 120 rhinos were reintroduced to member reserves of the greater kruger environmental protection foundation in mpumalanga and limpopo provincesthe first rhino release in this area in 50 years. In november, african parks discreetly moved additional rhinos to dinokeng game reserve, while 80 more were relocated to phinda private game reserve for acclimatization ahead of planned reintroductions to akagera (rwanda) and garamba (drc) in 2025. These efforts reflect meaningful improvements in park security and readiness, laying the groundwork for restoring rhino populations across multiple regions. The rhino rewild initiative plays a vital role in restoring natural habitats, supporting wildlife conservation, and promoting responsible tourism. The program also contributes to local economic opportunities and helps raise environmental awareness. In 2025, african parks will focus on ongoing acclimatization, habitat preparation, and strengthened protection measures in upcoming recipient parks.boma and badingilo national parks, south sudan: in 2024, african parks continued managing boma and badingilo national parks, which are home to the great nile migrationan extraordinary natural event involving nearly six million antelope. Spanning the boma-badingilo-jonglei landscape, this is the largest land mammal migration on earth. Despite regional instability, african parks has remained committed to protecting this unique wilderness and working with the 17 local communities who rely on its natural resources. Efforts this year focused on maintaining wildlife monitoring systems and reinforcing protection measures for migrating herds of white-eared kob, tiang, and mongalla gazelle. African parks collaborated with local leaders and rangers to strengthen patrols and improve early-warning systems, helping safeguard critical wildlife corridors and address illegal hunting. Community outreach expanded through educational programs and livelihood initiatives designed to support local well-being and promote shared conservation values. These programs aim to link environmental protection with practical benefits for families living in and around the parks. Looking ahead, african parks plans to increase locally led conservation activities, enhance monitoring of wildlife movements, and begin laying the foundation for sustainable tourism infrastructure, pending improvements in regional security.protected area management and community development: in 2024, african parks managed 22 national parks across 12 countries, protecting more than 49 million acresequivalent to 59% of the u.s. National park system. With a team of over 5,000 personnel, african parks' public-private partnership model delivered effective conservation while improving lives for millions of people living in and around these parks. Throughout the year, african parks strengthened park infrastructure, law enforcement, and ecological monitoring. Key conservation activities included wildlife surveys, species reintroductions, anti-poaching patrols, and data collection to support long-term management. These were complemented by wide-reaching community engagement programs. In malawi's liwonde national park, more than 4,800 children and 1,000 adults took part in environmental education activities, while literacy and scholarship programs expanded access to learning. Sustainable livelihood projects

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.6%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $40.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Pass
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.6% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $398K · 17 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $202K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.