African & American Friendship Associatio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 571139418
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6516455828
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,972
- Expenses
- $182,172
- Assets
- $6,699
- Liabilities
- $7,315
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide education and services to empower immigrants and refugees to be fully integrated into Minnesota's growth and development. The organization envisions immigrants and their children serving as leaders in Minnesota, while maintaining their cultural values and identity.
What it reported doing in 2012
The organization's main focus is on their foreign trained health professionals (fthp) program. This program strides to promote economic self-sufficiency and advancement of immigrants who are foreign trained healthcare professionals in Minnesota. The organization ensures that they get support to prepare and pass the licenser exams and practice in their healthcare profession in the united states. So far, the organization has registered over 200 foreign trained professionals from asia, africa, eastern europe, and latin and central america.integrating fthp for self sufficiency project: the organization, in partnership with women's initiative for self empowerment (wise), as the lead agency through a grant from the federal office of refugee resettlement (orr) provide information & education, mentorship, scholarship and advocacy to refugees in Minnesota who are foreign trained health care professionals.alternative career pathway for fthp women project: this is a project founded by women's foundation of Minnesota to wise in partnership with the organization. The goal of this project is to affect shifts in institutions and policies and thereby increase equality for foreign trained professional women in Minnesota.fthp advocacy project: funding from the headwaters foundation for justice enables the organization to disseminate information and provide educational activities, increasing/enhancing the power and advocacy skills of fthp and their immigrant community for system change and social justice. Headwaters' funding further facilitates the involvement and participation of community leaders, healthcare institutions and providers, and state legislators.fthp eliminating health disparities project: this project is funded by the park nicollet foundation to promote self sufficiency and advancement of foreign trained health professionals, in order to assist timely and effective integration of new americans into Minnesota healthcare system. The project provides recruitment, orientations, matching of professionals and peer mentors with healthcare professionals.fthp mentorship project: this project is funded by the park nicollet foundation to promote self sufficiency and advancement of foreign trained health professionals, in order to assist timely and effective integration of new americans into Minnesota healthcare system. The project provides recruitment, orientations, matching of professionals and peer mentors with healthcare professionals.international medical graduates residency project: the international medical graduates residency project a one year project funded by medtronic foundation through dr. Pat walker of the university of Minnesota, medical school in partnership with the organization. The aim of the project was to research and document best practice to enhance access to medical residency in Minnesota by foreign trained physicians.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 65% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.09; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -52.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $176K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.