Africa Harvest of Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 711004731
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Redlands, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9098099332
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,467
- Expenses
- $109,979
- Assets
- $69,492
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Walter Alan Reed (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Walter Alan Reed (President & CEO)
- Lloyd Bressler (Director)
- Martin Bruce (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Africa Harvest of Hope's mission is to build multiple homes to house 30 children each. Each home will have a caretaker (or couple) to oversee and guide the 'family' unit. The children who are placed into each home will be fed, clothed, attend school, receive healthcare, and learn to be integral parts of a 'family' to sustain their home and contribute to their community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Africa Harvest of Hope now sustains 26 children. 22 are school age and going to Private School that teaches English, and has a high success rate. 4 of the older children will begin their higher education program next year. Africa Harvest of Hope began supporting pastors who have finished a 3 year Bible College program adn want to start a new church. We currently support 5 pastors. The farm is growing and is becoming an income generator for the program costs. We added a chicken coop, a duck coop and a fish pond. Each helping the cost of feeding the children with home-grown protein. We rebuilt a home for a widow who lost her home in a mud slide. We show the Jesus video at outreaches to expose different villages in rural areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.