IReachAfrica
Legal name: Africa 180 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460825347
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Redding, CA, United States
- Phone
- 5302769823
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- International Relief
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,072,271
- Expenses
- $867,321
- Assets
- $1,612,250
- Liabilities
- $128,154
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tracy Evans (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Tracy Evans (President): $44,836 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
IReachAfrica is dedicated to public health initiatives, education programs, agricultural development, spiritual formation and social initiatives throughout Africa, serving without regard to race, creed, gender, religion, or age; its mission includes transformation language such as “out of poverty into prosperity, out of sickness into health, out of darkness into light.”
What it reported doing in 2025
Faith-Based Non-Profit Ministry to children and adults in Monzambique including health care, nutrition, education and leadership training. IReachAfricas chidrens education center hosts pre-school and kindergarten programs which were established to provide quality childhood christian education in an underprivileged region. We address the development of the whole child while inspiring creativity, hope, love and knowledge. The principle focuses of the center are academics, spiritual growth, health and nutrition, as well as a childs social and emotional development. We also offer after school programs and holiday bible schools. IReachAfrica nutrition and health center cares for hunderds of children, providing milk, weaning food, primary care, basic health needs to vulnerable children. As their mothers are their only source of milk and many moms die due to the harsh conditions, infants were left behind with no means of sustenance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $67.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 75.9% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $806K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.