Afghan Support Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873048027
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Beaverton, OR, USA
Phone
5037400877
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,678,560
Expenses
$2,277,198
Assets
$502,804
Liabilities
$21,491

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • YAHYA HAQIQI (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • YAHYA HAQIQI (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $127,589 total reported compensation
  • DARWAISH ZAKHIL (COMMUNITY ADVANCEMENT DIRE): $98,476 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To empower afghans in the portland metro through advocacy, services, and resources.

What it reported doing in 2024

Assistance to the community including staff support - our community support program plays a vital role in fostering community cohesion and addressing social isolation among the afghan community. Throughout 2024, we organized 10 major events with over 2,000 attendees, creating opportunities for social interaction, cultural celebration, and community building. These events are not only social gatherings but also platforms for disseminating vital information on topics like american culture, resource access, mental health support, and immigration. The program aims to strengthen communal ties, enhance cultural understanding, and provide educational resources. It underscores our organization's holistic approach to community support, going beyond immediate needs to foster a sense of belonging and collective growth. The total expenses for this program reflect our investment in nurturing a resilient and informed community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 82% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 35
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $44.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 95.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 94.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 83.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.