Afge Local 2778

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
586075240
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Decatur, GA, USA
Phone
4043216111
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$212,018
Expenses
$137,056
Assets
$898,691
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GLENDA CHESTNUT (President)
  • ANDREA HALL (Vice President)
  • CHELSIE FLOURNOY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • GLENDA CHESTNUT (President)
  • ANDREA HALL (Vice President)
  • JOHN CORN (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The union's mission is to represent bargaining unit members, collectively and individually as to their pay, benefits and working conditions. The union reviews, critiques and proposes amendments to the agency's proposed changes in working conditions that afect bargaining unit employees. The union assits indivduals or groups of bargaining unit employees with work related issues. The union also provides a social and support network to the union members and non union members

What it reported doing in 2023

The entitiy purpose and achievements is to represent union members and to assist them in working conditions issues, pay issues, and benefit issues. Their accomplishment is to find a satisfactory resolution to a variety of issues between management and the employees or those in the bargaining unit.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.56; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1141 of 1141 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.