AFGE Local 1121
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273389690
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2069152943
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,775
- Expenses
- $104,500
- Assets
- $61,623
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cheryl Erbar (President)
- Scott Lewis (Executive Vice President)
- Jesse Renaga (Regional Vice President - Alaska)
- Charles Little (Regional Vice President - Guam)
People named in this filing
- Cheryl Erbar (President)
- Bruce Keller (Treasurer)
- Donald Andrews (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Represent members in dealing with management to secure an enforcement of collective bargaining rights
What it reported doing in 2013
It is both our purpose and goal to provide representation for our members who, in the course of their employment with TSA, need guidance and assistance with job related concerns that affect the quality of their employment; including, but not limited to, work place environment; seniority issues; job skills as they pertain to education, qualifications, and their demonstration and performance; job security; fair employment protection; and personal information confidentiality. We achieve this ethical and fiscally responsible representation by providing member continuing education opportunities, and through our process of stewardship support regarding the filing of grievances and other statements and summaries; our presence at meetings involving the interaction of management and employees; our careful watch to ensure the integrity and respect of the rights and privileges negotiated through our legal collective bargaining agreement (CBA), and our right and prerogative to otherwise petition management, governmental bodies, our government representatives, and even the general public itself.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.7%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.